Biden’s WORKERS’ PARADISE will be HELL ON EARTH!
By now you’ve probably heard Sniffy Joe’s latest proposals
to complete Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America from capitalism to
His proposed plans include the following:
ONE: a national paid family and medical leave scheme to
provide socialist WORKERS up to $4,000 to care for a new child, with an
illness, or for an ill loved one.
TWO: funding for socialist WORKERS' child care and a $15
minimum wage for childhood staff and care centers.
THREE: extended tax credits for Obamacare premiums for
FOUR: permanent extension of the earned income tax credit
expansion for childless WORKERS.
FIVE: universal pre-kindergarten for all three- and
four-year old children so that WORKERS don’t have to pay for it.
But don’t be alarmed, folks. The U.S. went communist a long time ago. As long as there is an income tax and property tax, you are living under communism. You can continue waving the flag and going to patriotic rallies if you like, but you still live in a communist country. Here's why:
You don’t own your labor
In 1913 President Woodrow Wilson signed into law the Federal Income Tax, which was proposed in the Communist Manifesto. The control of the money supply, also proposed in the Manifesto, was accomplished by passage of the Federal Reserve Act in the same year.
The income tax laid claim to all the
fruits of your labor since there is no limit on how much they can steal from you. In
fact, in the 1950’s the highest rate was about 90%.
It appears to be much lower now, but it isn’t. Since income tax is levied at every stage of production on individuals and corporations, this is reflected in the price of goods. You are looking at an effective income tax rate of at least 90%. Without the income tax, that $50,000 car you bought would probably cost $10,000.
And I'm not even counting the "inflation tax" on the value of your currency and savings through the manipulation of the money supply by the Federal Reserve.
You don’t own your real estate
Every year you must pay rent on what you think
is your property. If you don’t pay the rent (which they euphemistically call property tax) they will repossess their property. After all, it's legally theirs when they can use it as collateral to borrow
money for schools, civic centers, parks, or anything else.
Property tax is rent. It’s the same old feudalist system under a different name. You didn’t own land then, you rented it from the
warlord. That’s feudalism. When you transferred the right to rent the land to
others it was called subinfeudation. It's the same feudalist system today. When you “sell” your home
and land, you merely sell the use of the property to someone else. Then they pay the rent deceitfully called property taxes. The government has always exercised "eminent domain" over its property.
Here’s why this is communism
The essence of socialism and communism is redistribution
of wealth. Accordingly, the communist slogan is: 'From
each according to his ability, to each according to his needs' (as opposed to
Quoting from Wikipedia: Although Marx is popularly thought of as
the originator of the phrase, the slogan was common within the socialist
movement. For example, August
Becker in 1844
described it as the basic principle of communism and Louis Blanc used it in 1851. The origin of this
phrasing has also been attributed to the French utopian Étienne-Gabriel
Morelly, who proposed in
his 1755 Code of Nature "Sacred and Fundamental Laws that
would tear out the roots of vice and of all the evils of a society". He
I. Nothing in society will belong to anyone, either as a personal possession or as capital goods, except the things for which the person has immediate use, for either his needs, his pleasures, or his daily work
II. Every citizen will be a public man, sustained by, supported by, and occupied at the public expense.
III. Every citizen will make his particular contribution to the activities of
the community according to his capacity, his talent and his age; it is on this
basis that his duties will be determined, in conformity with the distributive
The difference between so-called Democratic socialism, Nazi socialism and generic communism is merely semantics
In his monumental book, The Ominous
Parallels, author Dr. Leonard Peikoff points out that the Nazi socialists laughed
at the pretended difference between socialism and communism. I quote:
“Contrary to the Marxists, the Nazi did not advocate
public ownership of the means of production. They did demand that the
government oversee and run the nation’s economy. The issue of legal ownership,
they explained, is secondary; what counts is the issue of control. Private
citizens, therefore, may continue to hold titles to property—so long as the
state reserves to itself the unqualified right to regulate the use of their
“If ‘ownership’ means the right to determine the use and disposal of material goods, then Nazism endowed the state with every real prerogative of ownership. What the individual retained was merely a formal deed, a contentless deed, which conferred no rights on its holder. Under communism, there is collective ownership of property de jure. Under Nazism, there is the same collective ownership de facto.” Close quote.
Even Benjamin Franklin was for redistribution of wealth
“All property, indeed, except the savage's
temporary cabin, his bow, his match-coat, and other little acquisitions
absolutely necessary for his subsistence, seems to me to be the creature of
public convention . . . All the property that is necessary to a man for the
conservation of the individual and the propagation of the species is his
natural right, which none can justly deprive him of; but all property
superfluous to such purposes is the property of the public, who by their laws
have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it whenever the
welfare of the public shall demand such a disposition”.
—Benjamin Franklin, a Mason, in a Letter to Robert Morris, Dec. 25th 1783; cf. Bigelow, John, ed.,The Works of Benjamin Franklin, New York, 1904.
And here’s a quote from a 1933 U.S. Senate
document admitting they own all your property:
“The ultimate ownership of all property is
in the State; individual so-called 'ownership' is only by virtue of government,
i.e., law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and
subordinate to the necessities of the state.”
Document #43, 1933, “Contracts in Gold”
Now for the
Supreme Court’s admission:
“The governmental taking of property from one private owner to give to another in furtherance of economic development constitutes a permissible 'public use' under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.”
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).
another quote from the Ominous Parallels:
“Property to [the Nazis] did not mean
possession by right, but by government permission.”
—Leonard Peikoff, The
Ominous Parallels, (Penguin Group, 1982) p. 183.
In closing let me say there is obviously no comparison between the USA communist regime and the brutal communist regimes of Stalin and Mao. It's a matter of degree, that's all, but we can see where this is headed. Just don't be deceived by the iron fist in a velvet glove.
I showed in my Bolins Ghost YouTube videos that the federal government has absolutely no jurisdiction to infringe on the right to keep and bear arms of any type, including background checks. In 1934 they confiscated fully automatic weapons by means of onerous taxation during the middle of the Great Depression. Now they want to confiscate all semi-auto firearms and large capacity magazines over 10 rounds. At the same time, they plan exorbitant taxes and licensing laws to restrict firearm access to as many people as possible.
This isn't about safety. All necessary safety regulations related to firearms are properly and constitutionally limited to the states—not the federal mafia.
Let's face it, federal gun control laws are really incremental gun confiscation laws. Disarming the pubic is the final stage in every totalitarian takeover. We can ignore history, but history has shown what happens once the public is disarmed.
As President John Adams said, “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
Extended AUDIO PODCAST: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZEUc6kVBMc
Click here for more proof: https://www.laissez-fairerepublic.com/TenPlanks.html
See my Bolins Ghost videos on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/results search query=bolins+ghost
Website books: https://www.humancattle.com/
Website videos: : https://www.humancattle.com/page-1